professional victims turn into persecuting prostitutes


They’ll do whatever it takes for money! Their action plan is as carefully scripted as a hollywood blockbuster and the setups are deliberate and have a traceable timeline. Nothing is said off the cuff!

You can follow a trail of other broken relationships neatly tailored to fit the “Poor Me model.     I need you take care of me.      I love you blah blah blah.     Save me from my family who are demons from hell.    Save me from my fiancée who cheated on me.   SAVE ME!”

 

Their operating system is driven by an  outrageous egotistical even maniacal need to have it all and quickly asserts itself.

  • “Don’t want me to have your PIN numbers for your bank account?  You don’t trust me! Sob! Wail! Sulk! ” for days and weeks if need be.
  • Choose me or your family/friends
  • I’ve given up everything for you and I’m a little bit OCD on the cleaning up area – that’s how I get to look at all your personal data – I was just tidying up your files.  Aren’t I great?!!!  I slave for you while you’re gone.
  • It kills me that I’m dependent on you for money -   just as soon as I can I’ll give it all back in the meantime I want this and that and the next trinket/course/transport
  • Today is demure, I’m meeting your parents. Tomorrow, well you’ll pay for that time and time again.
  • If you don’t give me money, I’ll just go out and sell myself and it’ll be your fault. I have to live.
  • The phone you gave me doesn’t have international roaming facilities – how the hell do you expect me to connect to my family/friends.
  • I’ll kill myself if you don’t do X, Y, or Z.

Life is challenging enough!

If you’re in a relationship that has any of these hallmarks, you can and should get out of it.

  • You can live a decent, honest,loved and loving life.
  • Seek help from all who love and support you.
  •  Be open and don’t fall into the trap of not wanting the world to know how bad it is.
  • It will get worse as you become the victim/accessory of a scheme hatched in hell by the devil’s handmaiden.


Forgive yourself – that behaviour does not define you or your values


 

 

 

Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom.
Viktor E. Frankl
Even though there is no rational, reasonable way to make sense of a partner becoming violent, focus on what you can control:

  •  your emotions
  • you response
  • the meaning and interpretation of it all
  • your values
  • how you handle yourself

All around us, there are people who have endured harrowing life threatening experiences.  Some of those experiences are public like Viktor Frankl  but most are the ordinary people we know who have moved on from drama and violence and have put those events behind them and learnt how to navigate life more safely.  Their own experiences are not public for very good reasons:  They move on and to move on you need to control that inner voice that keeps looping.

 

Helplessness and hopelessness are only a whisper away from worthless. And you  owe it to yourself not to allow someone elses’ madness to frame your life.

Forgive yourself.  It was not your fault.

 

 

 

 

 

Wise up… you may save your life


 

 

 

Spouse Abuse a Two-Way Street By Warren Farrell, Ph.D. USA Today, June 29, 1994

 

When I began seven years of research into these issues in preparation for “The Myth of Male Power”, I began with these two assumptions since I had been the only man in the United States to have been elected three times to the Board of Directors of the National Organization of Women in New York City, and these assumptions went unquestioned in feminist circles.

My first finding – that in the U.S. and Canada more than 90% of the domestic violence reports to the police were by women, not men – seemed to confirm these assumptions. But, then the picture became more complex. About a dozen studies in the U.S. and Canada asked BOTH sexes how often they hit each other, all of them found that women hit men either more frequently or about as often as the reverse.

Two of the main studies – by Suzanne Steinmetz, Murray Straus and Richard Gelles – assumed men hit women more severely, so they divided domestic violence into seven different levels of severity. They were surprised to discover that, overall, the more severe levels of violence were conducted more by women against men.

A caveat, though. Men hitting women did more damage than the reverse. However, this caveat carried its own caveat: it was exactly because mens hits hurt more that women resorted to more severe methods (i.e. tossing boiling water over her husband or swinging a frying pan into his face). These findings were supported by the Census Bureaus own survey: As early as 1977, the U.S. Census Bureau conducted the National Crime Survey, surveying 60,000 households every six months for three and one half years. They found women use weapons against men 82% of the time; men use weapons against women 25% of the time. Overall, they found that even the women acknowledged they hit men more than men hit women.

The key issue, though, is who initiates this cycle of violence. Steinmetz, Strauss and Gelles found to their initial surprise that women are more likely to be the first initiators. Why? In part, the belief that men can take it – - they can therefore be a punching bag and not be expected to hit back.

I was still a bit incredulous. I asked thousands of men and women in my workshops to count all the relationships in which they had hit their partner before their partner had ever it them. and vice versa. About 60% of the women acknowledged they had more often been the first to strike a blow: among the men, about 90% felt their female partner had been the first to strike a blow.

I still felt violence was an out growth of masculinity. I was half right. Men are responsible for most of the violence which occurs outside the home. However, when 54% of women in lesbian relationships acknowledge violence in their current relationship, vs. only 11% of heterosexual couples reporting violence, I realized that domestic violence is not an outgrowth of male biology.

Why do we vigorously denounce domestic violence against women and not even know about domestic violence against men?

Women Abuse Men: Its More Widespread Than People Think By Armin A. Brott. M.D. From Special supplement to The Washington Post, 12/28/93

Despite all the evidence about female-on-male violence, many groups actively try to suppress coverage of the issue. Suzanne Steinmetz received verbal threats and anonymous phone calls from radical womens groups threatening to harm her children after she published “The Battered Husband Syndrome” in 1978. She says she finds it ironic that the same people who claim that women- initiated violence is purely self defense are so quick to threaten violence against people who do nothing more than publish a scientific study.

Steinmetzs story is not unique. Ten years after that study, R.L. McNeely, a professor at the School of Social Welfare at the University of Wisconsin, and Gloria Robinson-Simpson published “The Truth About Domestic Violence: A Falsely Framed Issue.” The article examined various studies on domestic violence and concluded that society must recognize that men are victims “or we will be addressing only part of the phenomenon.”

Shortly thereafter, McNeely received letters from a Pennsylvania womens organization threatening to use its influence in Washington to pull his research funding. Robinson-Simpson, who uncovered some of the most important data, largely was left alone. According to McNeely, “she, a young assistant professor, was assumed to have been “duped” by the senior male professor.”

Domestic Abuse: Its Not Always His Fault By Betsy Hart, Scripps Howard News Service 8/18/97

Not long ago members of Virginias General Assembly considered a bill meant to keep husbands from abusing their wives: putting a warning label at the top of marriage licenses! It didnt get far. (Possibly calmer heads prevailed and pointed out that its non marital relationships that are a major risk factor for abuse.)

Still, this attempt highlights the prevailing notion in domestic violence circles that “its always his fault.” That, in fact, is the title of the cover article in the summer issue of “The Womens Quarterly, ” published by the Independent Womens Forum, an increasingly high-profile group thats kind of an antidote to the National Organization for Women.

Author Sally L. Satel, psychiatrist and Yale medical school lecturer, shows how accepted Gloria Steinems assertion that “the patriarchy requires violence in order to maintain itself” has become. I.e., abusive men arent criminals, or drunks, or particularly troubled people some of whom may be redeemed. They are just men.

The Chicago Metropolitan Battered Womens Network explains: “Battery is a fulfillment of cultural expectation, not a defiant or sick behavior.” This view pervades the activist groups dealing with this issue, and the bureaucracies that fund them with federal dollars.

Today a dozen states basically preclude treatment other than feminist therapy of domestic batterers, Satel notes, and more are following. Forget joint counseling when appropriate and desired. Involving the batterers mate in treatment amounts to “blaming the victim .

That, despite the fact that many abuse experts unhindered by feminist blinders recognize abuse is often part of a “dance of mutual destructiveness” as psychologist Judith Shervin writes. And that women initiate violence in – relationships as often as men (often using weapons to make up for physical differences) according to leading abuse researchers-widely respected across philosophical lines – Richard Gelles and Murray Straus.

No matter. “Don,” a college administrator arrested for once slapping his wife (they are still together) was required to attend a typical “abuse” program. Every week “the message was clear,” Don told Satel. “Whatever she does to you is your fault, whatever you do to her is your fault. It would have been a lot more helpful if they taught us to recognize when we felt ourselves being driven into a position where we lash out. The message should have been “recognize it, deal with it, and quit hitting.” All Don got was guilt about his maleness.

Why We Don’t Know the Truth


 

 

http://www.lectlaw.com/files/fam27.htm

This quote taken from  a part of the  article contained in the link above.

 

“How could we all be so mistaken about family violence? Have we been conned? Have we been taken in by one of the slickest “stings” ever executed?

 

Here is how the truth has been hidden. Use of misleading statistics for political and financial gain: * Men do not usually report their violent wives to police. * Children do not usually report their violent mothers to the police. * Women are far more likely to report violent men to the police. * Police statistics describe the activities of the police departments and are grossly misleading as to the nature of family violence.

 

One study done of emergency room patients shows that only 1% of men who were injured by women reported the incident to police. That should be enough to be suspicious of police statistics on spousal violence. There are other reasons police statistics are dramatically misleading. Some women call the police because there is a real need for intervention. However, there are other reasons for a woman to report a man, whether he be violent or not. *

 

  • Women are encouraged to report spousal violence by countless media reminders.
  •  Propaganda always includes the female victim and the male perpetrator.
  •  Men are discouraged from claiming to be victims of violent women. *
  • Some women call police because they are frightened by a minor incident. Perhaps she thought calling the police was a “trump card” in an argument. These women do not realize that with one phone call they have invited the government and gender politics into their homes.
  • * Some women make false reports because there are legal, financial, and child custody rewards for making a false report.
  • Some divorce attorneys and gender activists specialize in encouraging false accusations, and actively coaching women how to falsely accuse.
  • Several researchers have documented that one of the common adaptive tools of human females, used to compensate for smaller size and social power, is to mimic victim behavior, including false accusations against a power figure (boss, parent, counselor, teacher, husband, lover, police, etc.). Adolescent girls are the demographic group most prone to this adaptive tool.”

Knowledge is power!  Keep safe. Inform yourself.

Naming and shaming violent, malicious people


How does any man protect himself from a woman who attacks him – not only verbally with a mouth like a sewer – but physically also cuts him with broken glass, biting, scratching, punching without being called an abuser?

How does he literally get her off his back to be able to move away from this when she is damaging every part of him she can lay her knees or hands, nails, teeth on? And when he does free himself by pushing her away, she screams ” concussion”?
Who steals everything he owns, cd’s, dvd player, camera, shreds every single piece of clothing, shoes, linen and bedding his passport, his id, his credit cards, his entire life’s mementos, puts acetone into his wine and port bottles and then leaves the country and says she is going to sue for injury and defamation.

Sure there is a police investigation but she is gone with all his stuff  from passports to bank details, dvd’s cd’s electronics equipment and will  surely do this again.  This is the third time she has played “victim”.

Decent honourable men get taken to the cleaners by women like this. What recourse is there for them? Should  the women’s names be made public just like other offenders? Especially if naming and shaming could save another man from the same predatory fate?

The real tragedy is that men are always seen as the aggressors.  Having seen this behaviour and recording some of it first hand, there is a real need for protecting men from this calculated, premeditated manic behaviour.  
Behaviour is always the leading indicator of values. This behaviour is severely disturbed at best and just plain evil at worst. Irrational manic rage and saccharine sweetness share her head like badly matched body parts.  You have to wonder at the calculated menace  of someone who would cut every single piece of clothing, shoes, belts, linen, laundry and pack it back neatly into the cupboard to be discovered after she had gone taking with her everything she could lay her hands on.
Fortunately this  young gentle man, in the truest sense of the word, is loved for his  warm  and caring nature and all his friends have rallied to support him..   The real pity of it is that her family are good people who are hurting too.

this link is important for all men who are dealing violent women


http://www.lectlaw.com/files/fam27.htm

I intend to keep it on every post.  Send it to all you know. Keep it as a reference  You never when you might meet someone who needs it.  Put it up on your facebook page.

 

Am I nuts?  No, not at all.  I have just drawn a line in the sand about really bad people getting away with anything they choose; who choose the nicest people in the world to prey on and hold up religion as  moral compass until they steal or mangle anyone who stands in their way.

 

I have seen a lot of things in my life but being held hostage by a manic individual intent on inflicting damage to any part of the body is something no one should have to experience.So as long as I am able I will work towards naming and shaming being an option for dealing with situations like this.

African sangomas and fire ants can come in handy


I’ve just been reading Jeremy Clarkson‘s  “For Crying out Loud, The World according to Clarkson“.  I’d pay money to hear his view on the subject of  malicious predators.

We all know that “this is a call for medical/psychiatric intervention – that they can’t help themselves”.   Bollocks as Clarkson would say!  Stop the goody two shoes /pollyanna-ish nonsense.

What would work infinitely better is the intervention of an African sangoma who could cast a spell to, say, prevent  sleeping without revisiting the meanness of  soul every time, or taking away  access to technology – that would seriously freak them  out since getting a reaction is key to the behaviour -  out or perhaps even a spell incarcerated with some fire ants  – that would concentrate the  mind like few other things could.

The eternal victim is as much about being a persecutor as it is about being a victim.  For the system to work there has to be a rescuer. Someone who wanders into the crosshairs of the  disturbed maniacal mind. Usually that someone has spoils to be taken.

Big Brother is a reality – every single thing we do is monitored at some level. Our perspective  is generally very negative.  This week it showed up in a really positive way as friends rallied to support a mate in crisis. Seth Godin’s view of the world as a tribe – albeit a technologically driven one is spot on.  Our contacts in the cyber  village of the 21st century are our mainstays.  But taking the village analogy a bit further, anyone who committed a crime was put into stocks for all the world to see and shower with any rotten  thing available. Everyone knew who you were and what you had done and that reputation would warn others about you. A rotten stench followed you.

Shame! Shame! Shame!   And that shaming is missing from our model now.

We’re all too  politically correct about  saying things as they are or  warning others about real trouble makers in case we infringe on their rights and their psyches. God forbid we should tell the story like it is.They’ve learnt how to use and manipulate the system and  they expert at provoking!  Defending yourself against this assault is just not ok?!

Bollocks! Enough already!

If we knew we would really wind up in the court of public stocks and be known for our meanness and criminality……now there’s a thought worth considering. So if anyone knows Jeremy, please ask him to apply his considerable talent to naming and shaming.

I add the same caution to women…. be careful, beware, it’s dangerous out there.


I don’t have a particular axe to grind against women.  What I do have is an absolute horror of violence against anyone.  The previous posts were particular because we have just experienced the situation described.

But as I re read the posts, it seemed to me to be a rant against women and it’s not about that.  It is about anyone being violated by another human being in a way that leaves you desperate and helpless and hopeless

So just for emphasis let me repeat the same caveats for women

There are some real lessons in this mess:

  •  Don’t go near women or men with sob stories, they are cunning and clever.
  •  They play victims very convincingly
  •  Do more than a cursory check
  •  Trust your values and instincts
  •  Make sure your security checks are good.
  •  Do not trust anyone near your banking details and that means keeping your filing out of her clutches.
  • Make sure your friends are comfortable with him/her
  • Don’t let her/him isolate you

If you have been in this situation also know this that the sooner you put it behind you, the sooner you recover.  From the stats in the previous post, consider yourself fortunate  if you managed to get away from a situation like this one.

Speaking as a woman to the men out there..Use google every single time you go out with someone new.


The horror movie experience that this week has been as this menacing woman ruined another  young man’s life has been nothing short of eye-opening.   I could not conceive the calculated, premeditated cunning that she has used.    I wish I had  trusted my instincts and had the courage to look her up on Google before she had created this mess.

And she had the audacity to say…. ” just one @*%little slip up”… when she was found out.

There are some real lessons in this mess:

  •  Don’t go near women with sob stories, they are cunning and clever.
  •  They play victims very convincingly
  •  Do more than a cursory check
  •  Trust your values and instincts
  •  Make sure your security checks are good.
  •  Do not trust anyone near your banking details and that means keeping your filing out of her clutches.
  • Make sure your friends are comfortable with her
  • Don’t let her isolate you

If you have been in this situation also know this that the sooner you put it behind you, the sooner you recover.  From the stats in the previous post, consider yourself fortunate  if you managed to get away from a situation like this one.

 

this link for men confronted with violence from women


http://www.lectlaw.com/files/fam27.htm

A small quote

“Just as bad cases make bad laws, so can celebrity cases reinforce old myths. The biggest myth the O.J. Simpson case is likely to reinforce is the myth that domestic violence is a one way street (male-to- female), and its corollary, that male violence against women is an outgrowth of masculinity.

When I began seven years of research into these issues in preparation for “The Myth of Male Power”, I began with these two assumptions since I had been the only man in the United States to have been elected three times to the Board of Directors of the National Organization of Women in New York City, and these assumptions went unquestioned in feminist circles.

My first finding – that in the U.S. and Canada more than 90% of the domestic violence reports to the police were by women, not men – seemed to confirm these assumptions. But, then the picture became more complex. About a dozen studies in the U.S. and Canada asked BOTH sexes how often they hit each other, all of them found that women hit men either more frequently or about as often as the reverse.

Two of the main studies – by Suzanne Steinmetz, Murray Straus and Richard Gelles – assumed men hit women more severely, so they divided domestic violence into seven different levels of severity. They were surprised to discover that, overall, the more severe levels of violence were conducted more by women against men.

A caveat, though. Men hitting women did more damage than the reverse. However, this caveat carried its own caveat: it was exactly because mens hits hurt more that women resorted to more severe methods (i.e. tossing boiling water over her husband or swinging a frying pan into his face). These findings were supported by the Census Bureaus own survey: As early as 1977, the U.S. Census Bureau conducted the National Crime Survey, surveying 60,000 households every six months for three and one half years. They found women use weapons against men 82% of the time; men use weapons against women 25% of the time. Overall, they found that even the women acknowledged they hit men more than men hit women.

The key issue, though, is who initiates this cycle of violence. Steinmetz, Strauss and Gelles found to their initial surprise that women are more likely to be the first initiator. Why? In part, the belief that men can take it – - they can therefore be a punching bag and not be expected to hit back.

I was still a bit incredulous. I asked thousands of men and women in my workshops to count all the relationships in which they had hit their partner before their partner had ever it them. and vice versa. About 60% of the women acknowledged they had more often been the first to strike a blow: among the men, about 90% felt their female partner had been the first to strike a blow.”

%d bloggers like this: